<電子ブック>
Principles of Advanced Mathematical Physics / by Robert D. Richtmyer
(Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. ISSN:18645887)
版 | 1st ed. 1978. |
---|---|
出版者 | (Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer) |
出版年 | 1978 |
本文言語 | 英語 |
大きさ | XVI, 424 p : online resource |
著者標目 | *Richtmyer, Robert D author SpringerLink (Online service) |
件 名 | LCSH:Mathematical physics FREE:Mathematical Physics FREE:Mathematical Methods in Physics FREE:Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics |
一般注記 | 1 Hilbert Spaces -- 2 Distributions; General Properties -- 3 Local Properties of Distributions -- 4 Tempered Distributions and Fourier Transforms -- 5 L2 Spaces -- 6 Some Problems Connected with the Laplacian -- 7 Linear Operators in a Hilbert Space -- 8 Spectrum and Resolvent -- 9 Spectral Decomposition of Self-Adjoint and Unitary Operators -- 10 Ordinary Differential Operators -- 11 Some Partial Differential Operators of Quantum Mechanics -- 12 Compact, Hilbert-Schmidt, and Trace-Class Operators -- 13 Probability; Measure -- 14 Probability and Operators in Quantum Mechanics -- 15 Problems of Evolution; Banach Spaces -- 16 Well-Posed Initial-Value Problems; Semigroups -- 17 Nonlinear Problems; Fluid Dynamics -- References A first consequence of this difference in texture concerns the attitude we must take toward some (or perhaps most) investigations in "applied mathe matics," at least when the mathematics is applied to physics. Namely, those investigations have to be regarded as pure mathematics and evaluated as such. For example, some of my mathematical colleagues have worked in recent years on the Hartree-Fock approximate method for determining the structures of many-electron atoms and ions. When the method was intro duced, nearly fifty years ago, physicists did the best they could to justify it, using variational principles, intuition, and other techniques within the texture of physical reasoning. By now the method has long since become part of the established structure of physics. The mathematical theorems that can be proved now (mostly for two- and three-electron systems, hence of limited interest for physics), have to be regarded as mathematics. If they are good mathematics (and I believe they are), that is justification enough. If they are not, there is no basis for saying that the work is being done to help the physicists. In that sense, applied mathematics plays no role in today's physics. In today's division of labor, the task of the mathematician is to create mathematics, in whatever area, without being much concerned about how the mathematics is used; that should be decided in the future and by physics HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46378-5 |
目次/あらすじ
所蔵情報を非表示
電子ブック | 配架場所 | 資料種別 | 巻 次 | 請求記号 | 状 態 | 予約 | コメント | ISBN | 刷 年 | 利用注記 | 指定図書 | 登録番号 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
電子ブック | オンライン | 電子ブック |
|
Springer eBooks | 9783642463785 |
|
電子リソース |
|
EB00232732 |
書誌詳細を非表示
データ種別 | 電子ブック |
---|---|
分 類 | LCC:QC19.2-20.85 DC23:530.15 |
書誌ID | 4000109793 |
ISBN | 9783642463785 |
類似資料
この資料の利用統計
このページへのアクセス回数:7回
※2017年9月4日以降