---

＜電子ブック＞
3.1416 And All That / by DAVIS, CHINN

版	2nd ed. 1985.
出版者	(Boston, MA : Birkhäuser Boston : Imprint: Birkhäuser)
出版年	1985
大きさ	IX, 188 p : online resource
著者標目	*DAVIS author CHINN author SpringerLink (Online service)
件　名	LCSH:Mathematics LCSH:History FREE:History of Mathematical Sciences
一般注記	1. The Problem That Saved a Man’s Life -- 2. The Code of the Primes -- 3. Pompeiu’s Magic Seven -- 4. What Is an Abstraction? -- 5. Postulates—The Bylaws of Mathematics -- 6. The Logical Lie Detector -- 7. Number -- 8. The Philadelphia Story -- 9. Poinsot’s Points and Lines -- 10. Chaos and Polygons -- 11. Numbers, Point and Counterpoint -- 12. The Mathematical Beauty Contest -- 13. The House That Geometry Built -- 14. Explorers of the Nth Dimension -- 15. The Band-Aid Principle -- 16. The Spider and the Fly -- 17. A Walk in the Neighborhood -- 18. Division in the Cellar -- 19. The Art of Squeezing -- 20. The Business of Inequalities -- 21. The Abacus and the Slipstick -- 22. Of Maps and Mathematics -- 23. “Mr. Milton, Mr. Bradley—Meet Andrey Andreyevich Markov” -- 24. 3.1416 and All That -- Ancient and Honorable Society of Pi Watchers: 1984 Report LYTTON STRACHEY tells the following story. In intervals of relaxation from his art, the painter Degas used to try his hand at writing sonnets. One day, while so engaged, he found that his in­ spiration had run dry. In desperation he ran to his friend Mallarme, who was a poet. "My poem won't come out," he said, "and yet I'm full of excellent ideas. " "My dear Degas," Mallarme retorted, "poetry is not written with ideas, it is written with words. " If we seek an application of Mallarme's words to mathematics we find that we shall want to turn his paradox around. We are led to say that mathematics does not consist of formulas, it consists of ideas. What is platitudinous about this statement is that mathe­ matics, of course, consists of ideas. Who but the most unregenerate formalist, asserting that mathematics is a meaningless game played with symbols, would deny it? What is paradoxical about the state­ ment is that symbols and formulas dominate the mathematical page, and so one is naturally led to equate mathematics with its formulas HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8519-0

 類似資料